Downloads: 21
View: 424
India's judicial system, often a subject of scrutiny for its perceived sluggishness, has emerged asa central point of contention regarding its influence on the nation's evolving economic landscape.
This paper conducts a thorough examination of India's judicial system, specifically addressing the escalating backlog of cases in the Supreme Court, High Courts, and District Courts. The study delves into the significant implications this backlog holds for the country's economic prosperity. The historical background and constitutional mandates for timely justice underscore the significance of the issue. The analysis of pendency in the Supreme Court, High Courts, and District Courts reveals a troubling pattern of judicial delay, with backlogs consistently increasing over the years. Over a ten-year period, encompassing data from 2012 to 2022, this study endeavors to establish correlations and regression models that illuminate the relationship between indicators of judicial efficiency, including average case disposal time and case backlog, and economic performance, as evidenced by GDP growth.
Nileena Banerjee (2025) "Justice Delayed, Prosperity Denied: An Indepth Economic Analysis of Judicial Backlogs in India", GNLU Journal of Law And Economics : Volume VI 2023, Issue II
Available at:
https://gnlu.ac.in/GJLE/Publications/Justice Delayed, Prosperity Denied: An Indepth Economic Analysis of Judicial Backlogs in India
The essay examines the violence that unfurled in Bangladesh in 2024 from the lens of the relativedeprivation theory to explain the role of perceived inequality in political violence, and the prospecttheory to explain the role of prospect losses as a motivation for individuals to participate inpolitical violence. The essay analyses the events that acted as a trigger for the social unrest andfocuses on the contentious quota to explain the decisionmaking process of the players involved,from the viewpoint of the prospect theory. The essay also looks at macroeconomic variables suchas youth unemployment, inflation etc. during both the years that marked a social unrest among thegeneral population and found that in both years, the economy had shown worrying trends. Theessay also looks at the role of costs and benefits as perceived by an individual while making achoice in a risky situation. The conceptual framework is further demonstrated by a game wherethe decisionmaking process of the government, as a player, is discussed. It is found that theequilibrium for both the players is at the first outcome, where the participation is met withsuppression by the government. The most ideal outcome for both the parties is a peaceful approachto the issue at hand. Based on the existing research, and the game theory, policy recommendationshave been formulated emphasizing the need for a stronger penal system, to augment the costs thatare associated with participation in violence, and to make infrastructural developments to addressthe socioeconomic issues at hand. The establishment of transparent communication channelswould also go a long way in mitigating the risks of future unrest.