logo
logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Board
    • Abstracting & indexing
    • Copyright & Licensing Information
    • Peer Rreview Process
    • PEPMS
  • Volumes
  • Call for Papers
  • Publication Guidelines
  • Contact Us
banner

Tags: Keywords: Waqf, Rentcontrol, Game theory, Incentives, Pareto Efficiency

AntiRent Control Legislation a Boon or Bane: Economic Analysis of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013

  • By Ishita Kohli
  • 6 Months ago
  • Downloads: 1

  • View: 36

Volume VI 2023 Issue I GNLU Journal of Law And Economics

With various governments enacting laws in its favour, Rent Control is among the leadingwelfare measures to have endured the test of time in Indian polity.

The Delhi Rent Control Act is the Rent Control law adopted for this study. Various pedagogical tools from the field of law and economics, be it a cost-benefit analysis, game theory, pareto efficiency and bargaining theory aid this discovery. The research paper also looks at judgments passed by Indian courts considering the tenants’ rights at stake vis-a-vis the benefits sought to be gained by the Waqf Board and the public. Facilitated by these various means, this paper makes an argument in favour of the amendment.


Recommended Citation

Ishita Kohli (2025) "AntiRent Control Legislation a Boon or Bane: Economic Analysis of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013 ", GNLU Journal of Law And Economics : Volume VI 2023, Issue I
Available at: https://gnlu.ac.in/GJLE/Publications/AntiRent Control Legislation a Boon or Bane: Economic Analysis of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013

  • You may also like to read
Pandemic and the Anecdote of Indias Welfare State

  • Siddhant Dubey and Shrishti Natani
Fuelling Compliance with Competition Law: Competition Commission of India and the Automobile Sector

  • Soumya Hariharan, Nandita Sahai, Sakshi Agarwal and Akrathi Shetty
Risk, Deprivation, and Revolt: An Economic Examination of Bangladesh's Political Unrest

The essay examines the violence that unfurled in Bangladesh in 2024 from the lens of the relativedeprivation theory to explain the role of perceived inequality in political violence, and the prospecttheory to explain the role of prospect losses as a motivation for individuals to participate inpolitical violence. The essay analyses the events that acted as a trigger for the social unrest andfocuses on the contentious quota to explain the decisionmaking process of the players involved,from the viewpoint of the prospect theory. The essay also looks at macroeconomic variables suchas youth unemployment, inflation etc. during both the years that marked a social unrest among thegeneral population and found that in both years, the economy had shown worrying trends. Theessay also looks at the role of costs and benefits as perceived by an individual while making achoice in a risky situation. The conceptual framework is further demonstrated by a game wherethe decisionmaking process of the government, as a player, is discussed. It is found that theequilibrium for both the players is at the first outcome, where the participation is met withsuppression by the government. The most ideal outcome for both the parties is a peaceful approachto the issue at hand. Based on the existing research, and the game theory, policy recommendationshave been formulated emphasizing the need for a stronger penal system, to augment the costs thatare associated with participation in violence, and to make infrastructural developments to addressthe socioeconomic issues at hand. The establishment of transparent communication channelswould also go a long way in mitigating the risks of future unrest.

  • Nabeeha Sama and Vansh Gaint
flogo
Get Connected -

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Volumes
  • Call for Papers
  • Publication Guidelines
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us

Contact Us

  • +91-79-23276611
  • +91-79-23276612
  • gjle@gnlu.ac.in

Contact Us: www.gjle.in

© 2024, All Rights Reserved by GNLU Journal of Law & Economics

Powered by - Adit Microsys